In November of 2018, Google announced that Lighthouse would drive PageSpeed Insights. Lighthouse, an open-source, automated tool built into Chrome Developer Tools, analyzes performance metrics from lab and field data to return a performance score and a checklist of improvement opportunities.
Faster interaction times can improve your site ROI. Lighthouse audits highlight content and/or scripts that impede end-users interaction with visible content on the webpage. As the user begins to read or interact with the visible content, additional content and scripts continue to load or run in the background.
How Do Many Websites Score?
An analysis in June 2018 of the Lighthouse performance scores of 70 leading retailers found that most of them operate slow websites. The average score was a 22.1 out of 100. B&H Photo scored 59, to top the list, while several sites scored a zero.
How to Test Your Site?
To run a test with Lighthouse, load the web page into your Chrome browser and open the Developer Tools panel with the keyboard shortcut Command+Option+I (Mac) or Control+Shift+I (Windows, Linux). Alternatively, go through the Chrome menu under More Tools, under the Audits tab, click Run Audits.
Lighthouse tests a single page at a time. For a more comprehensive look at the status of your site, run the test on multiple pages with different content types. Include key conversion pages, such as signups and shopping carts. Remember that different network conditions and external resources may cause a site’s score to vary in subsequent tests. Run Lighthouse tests from a hosted service to improve consistency.
About the Results
Below are the results of the developers.google.com site as audited for performance by Lighthouse against a Simulated Fast 3G connection. Don’t let the red, orange, and green color scheme mislead you -- Opportunities are not Errors. This report sheds light on ways to improve site performance. Caution: Some improvements come at the cost of significant implementation and/or maintenance effort, sometimes with little potential ROI.
Out of 100 possible points,
- Good sites score over 75;
- Average sites run 45-74;
- Poor sites range from 44 to 0.
- Only results under Metrics contribute to the score.
Audits under Opportunities and Diagnostics do not impact the overall score. See the Lighthouse Scoring Guide for more detail.
What can you do to Improve Site Scores?
Defer off-screen images
Optimize image files and sizes as your first and most effective way to improve site speed. Next, if your site includes many or large images or videos, lazy-load assets that are not critical to the first screen view. Lazy loading allows for faster perceived load time and fewer downloads to the end-user.
Limit third-party scripts to those that produce significant ROI. According to the Google developers’ site, “Third-party scripts are a predominant cause of performance slowdowns and are often caused by resources outside of your control.”
Examples of third-party scripts:
- Social sharing buttons (e.g. Twitter, Facebook, G+)
- Video player embeds (e.g. YouTube, Vimeo)
- Advertising iframes
- Analytics & metrics scripts
- A/B testing scripts for experiments
- Helper libraries, such as date formatting, animation and functional libraries.
Maintain these tools and services on your site only if they add enough value to balance the performance cost. Confirm that any third-party scripts are minified and otherwise performance-optimized though use of such attributes as async, defer, preconnect and dns-prefetch.
Titan v6.9.5 Performance Features that improve site scores
Eliminate render-blocking resources
Preconnect to required origins
- Minification and bundling of static assets
Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy
- HTTP header optimizations to extend static file expirations and better leverage browser cache
- Reduction of server load time through improved server-side caching to reduce database demand
Avoid enormous network payloads; Size images Properly
Titan image uploads automatically extend to create multiple image sizes (thumbnail, small, medium, and large by default), which users can customize, expand and leverage to send just the right size image to any given page.
‘Opportunities’ That are Difficult to Implement and may not Balance Against ROI
Serve images in next-gen formats
Google Page Speed and other tests return errors or warnings recommending next-gen technologies and suggest formats that are difficult to manage currently. Take, for example, the recommendation to “serve images in next-gen formats,” such as WebP, JPEG XR and JPEG 2000. Browser support for these next-gen file types is limited; common image optimization tools, such as Adobe Photoshop, do not yet export to these file types. It is possible to create them and write code to supply them to the few users who might benefit, while also creating and serving fallback images to most of your users.
These advanced methods will place you top-of-class among the technology elite. Your site will be cutting-edge. Of course, it will also take longer to create and maintain the code, and still more time and effort will go to maintaining the image assets.
Efficiently encode and Size images Properly
Warnings will alert you to unoptimized images. Again, optimizing your images is your best defense against poor site performance and long load times. However, to fully clear this “opportunity” from the audit results, the site would need to use either the <picture> element and or <img srcset>, which means storing multiple versions of an image or employing third-party image optimization services and CDNs.
- What are the drawbacks?
- Maintaining multiple versions of every image can be challenging for content creators (Titan’s Native Sizes feature takes care of this problem).
- Content creators must understand how individual images and their containers change across screen sizes and must code for appropriate image sizes.
- Third-party image optimization services add significant cost to your project.
- Internet Explorer does not support the picture tag. Use fallback code or a polyfill to make your site compatible with IE.
Defer unused CSS
Ensure text remains visible during webfont load
Commonly used, free Google fonts do not natively support this suggestion. However, fonts can be served locally and coded to meet this suggestion. In this case, the user may see a flash of unstyled text, meaning the text will flash from the fallback font to the branded font when the latter has loaded. This flash can be unsettling for the user and might shift the layout.
Site audits can be helpful tools for exposing glaring content errors (especially unoptimized images) and by highlighting opportunities to maximize your site’s performance. But don’t get too caught up with audit scores. Your perfect score balances your users’ needs and business needs.